Ok, thanks. I find it a little odd to use the direct links rather than the other HTML link, but if that’s the way it works, I’ll use it.
Thank you both again for your help.
html link means the link will have html code pre written so
Lets say direct link
ibb.co/xyz.png
html code will be:
<img src="ibb.co/xyz.png">
Nothing different. Direct link is more convenient.
So it’s a shortened URL. But the i.ibb.co… verses what I had was just ibb.co… is generated and that was I found as odd.
No it isn’t a shortened url. Its the direct url. Whenever you want to use that image use the direct url. Not other options.
ibb.co and i.ibb.co are something else. No relation here.
Don’t complicate it.
1 Like
Sorry, not trying to complicate things. All I’m saying is that the provided path for the direct URL gives me iib co, which does not work. I have to alter the path to say i.iib.co. That works, but the images are fuzzy and not sized properly. The style statement to define the height and width does make them fit differently, but I had to resize the image to the size I wanted and use it since the original image was getting chopped off at both ends. The lack of sharpness and clarity is puzzling. When I have them on the web hosting server, they look fine, but load slowly.
Thanks again for your help.
The i.ibb.co is a cdn. Nothing special.
Your images stay unchanged, no change in sharpness etc.
Size difference is likely caused by your css.
Here’s a humble example:
https://xedit.ihtesham.repl.co/x/7600/
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.